Impact assessment report sees ecological disaster in Bangladesh; Teesta, 3 other rivers to perish; experts fear damage may go far beyond the forecast.
Sea water will intrude Manikganj, Kushtia, Goalanda, Bhairab and  beyond, travelling 280 kilometres if India implements its controversial  river-linking project. 
And, biodiversity of almost half of the country, including the mangrove forest Sundarbans, will be ruined, experts say.
A  study conducted five years ago by Bangladeshi experts to know the  project impacts assessed that about 30,000 square kilometres of Khulna  and Barisal divisions and parts of Rajshahi and Dhaka divisions  including the capital would be  severely affected. 
“We basically  conducted a qualitative study based on information we got from several  sources. The effect could be even worse,” said a senior hydro and  geo-environment analyst. 
There will be no flow in the  north-western rivers -- the Teesta, Mahananda, Dharla and Dudhkumar --  during the monsoon as water will be diverted to the river Fulhar through  Mechi.
The mega plan that involves linking 30 major rivers and  diverting the Ganges and the Brahmaputra has remained highly contentious  since it was first devised in 1980. 
Environmentalists and  neighbouring countries were against it, saying the scheme would wreak  havoc on ecology of the entire region. 
India maintains the Rs  5,000-crore project will increase its irrigation coverage from 120  million hectares to 160 millions and boost up crop production. 
The  issue drew attention of Bangladeshi and Indian media again after the  Indian Supreme Court on Monday ordered quick implementation of the  project and appointed a high-powered committee to put it into action.  
Biodiversity,  agriculture and industry of the Ganges dependable area (GDA) -- both  sides of the river Padma -- and parts of the Meghna river bank will be  badly hit. GDA alone covers 20 percent of the country and is home to  around 30 million people. 
“Life of residents in a large area  would be devastated due to lack of sweet water,” said M Inamul Haque,  chairman of Water and Environment, a non-government organisation. 
The  river-linking project aims diverting river water from Indian  north-eastern region, an area with high rainfall (3,500mm a year) to its  west, a region with low rainfall (700 mm), causing a very high-cost  environmental degradation not only in Bangladesh but also in some parts  of India, he said.
“It would destroy the biodiversity in half of the country's plain land and wetland.” 
The  assessment report of Bangladeshi experts echoed the view of Inamul  Haque. They forecast several impacts that include reduction in river  flows, rise in salinity of soil, surface and groundwater, damage of  agriculture, fisheries, navigation routes, coastal biodiversity and  fisheries, increase in river erosion, decrease in sedimentation and  ruining.
The experts who conducted the study do not want to be names at the moment. 
The  say if the Indian project is implemented, water from the Bay would  travel in 280km through the Madhumati, Dhaleshwari, Padma and Meghna  rivers.
The mighty Brahmaputra, which is known as the Jamuna and  which meets up two-thirds of the country's demand of water during the  dry seasons, will loose navigation. 
The flows of some other  rivers -- Gorai, Madhumati, Nabagnaga, Ichhamati-Mathabhanga,  Kapotakkhya, Betna, Meghna, Surma, Kushiara, Old Brahmaputra,  Dhaleshwari, Buriganga, Shitalakkhya, Arial Kha and Turag -- will be  reduced. 
The scheme would require construction of large  barrages to store water for lean period. India will have to release  water during the monsoon. As a result, floods in Bangladesh would be  prolonged, said a young hydrologist who also conducted a portion of the  study. 
The report also says the river project would cause water inundations in Barisal and Noakhali districts.

